TrainYourEars EQ Edition is an ear training software for Mac and PC designed to help you understand equalisers and frequencies like never before.
It speeds up your learning process exposing you to hundreds of random equalizations you have to guess. If you are wrong, it will let you know “how wrong”, and it will let you hear both your guess and the correct answer.
In no time you will develop a frequency memory which will allow you to connect the sound you imagine in your head with the parameters you need to dial, quickly and easily than ever.
It has a brand new training method. Instead of guessing, you have to make corrections while you hear the result.
The person who suggested this method to us in the first place was Bob Katz, a renowned mastering guru. We tested it, we loved it, so here it is for all you to enjoy!
Besides it has a new, modern and clean interface, a new assisted training screen, a new exercise designer, it supports other languages, and many other features.
The ability to connect what is in your mind with the appropriate parameters you have to dial to get that sound is not an easy task. The steps involved should be:
Sometimes people get lost in the translation step and start turning knobs without confidence. The more you work, the better you understand what those knobs really do, but it is a slow process.
People excel in this matter after many years, because they have learned experimenting with lots of different processes applied to lots of different sources. The purpose of this training is to open your ears to what each frequency sounds like and reduce the amount of time needed to acquire this knowledge.
In 15 minutes you can guess or correct 100 random equalisations, so training every day for a few weeks is equivalent to accumulating the experience of many years.
First, you load the music you want to train with:
Then, you choose an exercise or design a new one:
And finally, train your ears with one of these two methods!
Wanna see more?
In short, the phrase captures a cultural moment where intimacy is being rebranded as skill acquisition; that shift can improve relationships when guided by consent and personalization, but it becomes harmful when it replaces mutuality with performance.
I’m not sure what the original phrase means literally, so I’ll make a reasonable assumption and provide a clear, polished commentary interpreting it as a provocative line about couples, gender roles, and sexual training or expectations. Here’s a concise, significant commentary:
This signals three linked social dynamics. First, normalization of sexual coaching: what was once private experimentation is now framed as skills to be learned—techniques, communication scripts, and performance norms—turning intimacy into a set of trainable competencies. Second, role renegotiation within couples: established gendered scripts (who initiates, who leads) are being challenged, producing anxiety and adaptation as partners learn new expectations. Third, cultural commodification and digital mediation: apps, influencers, and online “experts” package sexual knowledge into prescriptive lessons, amplifying a sense that couples must enroll in an external curriculum to succeed.
A constructive response: center consent, curiosity, and mutual agency. Couples should treat any “training” as optional tools rather than prescriptions—experiment collaboratively, prioritize dialogue about comfort and boundaries, and resist metrics that equate success with conformity to trends. Therapists and sex educators can help translate techniques into ethically grounded, relationship-specific practices.
In short, the phrase captures a cultural moment where intimacy is being rebranded as skill acquisition; that shift can improve relationships when guided by consent and personalization, but it becomes harmful when it replaces mutuality with performance.
I’m not sure what the original phrase means literally, so I’ll make a reasonable assumption and provide a clear, polished commentary interpreting it as a provocative line about couples, gender roles, and sexual training or expectations. Here’s a concise, significant commentary: incha couple ga you galtachi to sex training s new
This signals three linked social dynamics. First, normalization of sexual coaching: what was once private experimentation is now framed as skills to be learned—techniques, communication scripts, and performance norms—turning intimacy into a set of trainable competencies. Second, role renegotiation within couples: established gendered scripts (who initiates, who leads) are being challenged, producing anxiety and adaptation as partners learn new expectations. Third, cultural commodification and digital mediation: apps, influencers, and online “experts” package sexual knowledge into prescriptive lessons, amplifying a sense that couples must enroll in an external curriculum to succeed. In short, the phrase captures a cultural moment
A constructive response: center consent, curiosity, and mutual agency. Couples should treat any “training” as optional tools rather than prescriptions—experiment collaboratively, prioritize dialogue about comfort and boundaries, and resist metrics that equate success with conformity to trends. Therapists and sex educators can help translate techniques into ethically grounded, relationship-specific practices. First, normalization of sexual coaching: what was once
Final price was 89€, but the 49€ launch offer was such a success that we sold twice as many as we expected.
After a lot of thought we decided to keep this reduced price forever :)
Thanks to all the people who has supported this project so far and made this possible!
Trusted by thousands of students and teachers from the world’s top universities.