WHO (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edition. World Health Organization.
The use of MMS (Master Mineral Solution) and BEE (a proprietary solution often used in conjunction with MMS) for water purification and disinfection has gained popularity in recent years. However, concerns have been raised about the safety and efficacy of these solutions. This paper reviews the existing literature on MMS/BEE and explores alternative, free, or low-cost methods for water purification and disinfection. We evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of these alternatives, including solar disinfection, boiling, ceramic filtration, and other methods. Our analysis suggests that while MMS/BEE may have some benefits, there are several alternative methods that are equally or more effective, and often free or low-cost. mmsbee alternative free
Hunter, P. R. (2003). Ceramic filters for water treatment. Journal of Water and Health, 1(1), 33-40. WHO (2017)
Sherpa, A., et al. (2015). Impact of boiling water on diarrheal disease incidence in a rural community in Nepal. Journal of Water and Health, 13(2), 249-257. The use of MMS (Master Mineral Solution) and
MMS/BEE have been promoted as a low-cost, easy-to-use solution for water purification and disinfection. However, studies have raised concerns about their safety and efficacy. For example, a study published in the Journal of Water and Health found that MMS/BEE did not consistently meet international water quality standards (WHO, 2017). Additionally, there have been reports of adverse health effects associated with MMS/BEE use, including gastrointestinal problems and skin irritation (CDC, 2019).
CDC (2019). MMS/BEE and other alternative water treatment methods. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
