Made as iconic director/cinematographer Joe D’Amato was approaching the end of his prolific career (and yet, with another 97 adult-oriented films to go), Provocation / Provocazione is basically softcore adult masquerading as erotica, with long sex sequences lacking the graphic intercourse details D’Amato was well-experienced with in his hardcore efforts.
The countryside location – an old inn made of quarried stone – adds the right rustic atmosphere in this familiar tale of an innkeeper’s wife (Fabrizia Flanders) who fancies a visiting businessman (Lyle Lovett lookalike Antonio Ascani, aka “Tony Roberts”), while her husband Gianni Demartiis) goes after his cousin (Erika Savastani), set to live at the house after the recent death of her papa. An idiot nephew (Lindo Damiani) indulges in some masturbatory voyeurism by sneaking around the house without his shoes and peering through floor cracks at everyone else’s fun time.
The characters are flat, D’Amato’s directorial style can’t craft any sense of humour beyond exchanges of berating insults (most inflicted on the nephew), and the performances vary in quality; the older actors fare the best, whereas Ascani seems very uncomfortable (maybe it’s the ill-fitting, wrinkled up linen suit), and Savastani’s healthy figure can’t mask her complete lack of talent.
D’Amato also slaps on stock music, and repeats the same cheesy early eighties muzak over sex scenes, and the film isn’t particularly well lit – perhaps a sign that his years in porn made him lazy after filming some very stylish ‘scope productions (such as the blazingly colourful L’Anticristo).
D’Amato’s efforts to make something more upscale isn’t a failure – there’s more than enough nudity to keep fans happy – and one can argue he was still capable of making a slick commercial product after going bonkers with sex, blood, and animals in his most notorious efforts. The photography and editing have a basic classical style, but there’s no energy in the film, making Provocation a work best-suited for D’Amato fans and completists.
Mya’s DVD comes from a decent PAL-NTSC conversion, although there’s some flickering in the opening titles. The details are sharp, the colours stable, but there lighting is rather harsh, as though the transfer was made from a high contrast print. (The film’s titles, Italian at the beginning, and English at the end - “The story, all names, characters and incidentals portrayed in this production, are fictitius” - are also video-based, indicating Provocation was meant as product for video rental shelves.)
Besides English and Italian dub tracks, there are no extras, which is a shame, given something could’ve been written about the product and its cast, many of whom were pinched by D’Amato from prior Tinto Brass productions. Savastani had just appeared as a bit player in Brass’ The Voyeur / L'Uomo che guarda (1994), and would move on with co-star Demartiis to Fermo posta Tinto Brass / P.O. Box Tinto Brass (1995) and Senso ’45 / Black Angel (2002).
© 2009 Mark R. Hasan
|
Manga Yuusha Ni Minna Netoraretakedo Akiramezu Ni Tatakao Kitto Saigo Wa Ore Ga Katsu Raw Chapter 10 Full [BEST]
Next, the user wants a paper. They might be a student needing an academic-style paper analyzing the manga. But without more information about the actual content of the manga, it's hard to do an analysis. Do they know the story details? Are they just looking for a general paper structure using the title as a theme? The user hasn't specified whether they need a summary, literary analysis, critical essay, or something else.
Another consideration: they mentioned "chapter 10". If the paper is about this specific chapter, I need details about what happens in chapter 10 to discuss it. Without knowing the plot points, themes, character development, or literary devices used in the chapter, writing an analysis is challenging. The user might be under the impression that I can generate information based on the title alone, which isn't possible. Next, the user wants a paper
First, I need to check if this is a real manga. Sometimes people might make up titles or refer to something that's not well-known. A quick search for the title in Japanese doesn't immediately bring up any recognizable results. It could be a niche or newly released manga, or maybe it's an original title the user is thinking of. Since I can't access the internet to verify, I have to work with the information given. Do they know the story details
Also, the user might be looking for a response in Japanese or in English. Since the title is in Japanese, but the request is in English, maybe they want the paper in English. However, I should confirm the language preference if possible. Another consideration: they mentioned "chapter 10"
In summary, the user probably wants an academic paper about this manga's chapter, but without specific information on the manga's plot, characters, or themes, writing a detailed analysis isn't feasible. My response should clarify that I can't access the manga's content and ask for more information or offer to help structure a paper if they can provide details. Alternatively, I can create a sample paper based on a hypothetical interpretation of the title's themes.
I should also consider if the user wants the paper to include specific elements like themes, character analysis, or narrative techniques. Without knowing the actual content of the manga, any analysis would be speculative. It's important to manage expectations here—inform the user that I can't access specific manga details but can help craft a paper based on a hypothetical or based on information they provide.
Additionally, the mention of "raw chapter 10 full" might imply that the user is looking for the full text or a detailed summary, which I can't provide if I don't have access to it. If the manga is fictional, I can create a fictional analysis. If it's real and I just can't access it, the user needs to provide more details. |